must be a submarine size nuclear reactor for a laser weapon, while it so much does not need a nuclear missile, that is as big as a rocket, in space to shoot down satellites. They are just not as big as Hiroshima or anywhere close. Dropping from space down to NY is slower than using an intercontinental rocket, because the bomb needs to enter the atmosphere like a Space Shuttle.
A laser is no more than bundled light created by a light source falling through a or a set of lenses. The more bundled the sronger the laser will be. Everyone with some mean character might have tried using a miagnifying lense from Grandpa on an ant. The ant will burn from a few centimeters away.
Obviously, to take down a solid object of bigger size both lens and light source must be of also bigger size and when creating a laser beam the energy source for the bulb is the problem.
Are you sure you are close to a fusion reactor, The West?
#ihateyou #me&theidiots
PS: Are you sure that was not copies of SDI in your files? Amphetamine makes you stupid, CIA. You thought in the 80ies that the Sowjets would put nukes into space and even managed to have them sign a ban on nuclear weapons in space. I never got a vid of the russian head scientist saying in russian: Why would we do that??, unfortunatelly.
Why? Just fucking google "reentering the atmosphere from space" or check how a Space Shuttle shakes riding through the outer to the inner parts of atmospher and stupid CIA wankers .... I am loosing it...can't connect the dots to AN EXPLOSIVE DEVICE might be stupid trying the same.
being on the top list of CIAs most intelligent is hard, dudes....#gfyCIA
PS: The best prisoner is the prisoner that does not know he is a prisoner and he had to exchange the hand grip of the passanger car door....that fucking moron.
Yours,
Pinky
PS: Nr 2.We gonna all fuck you so hard in what is coming here, Nazis. And I was just bored.
