collaps. To predict the collaps of a system in which money is given for money you need these parts:
Given capital at the point the monetary system is swapped to credit money: GC
Average fail to return of borrowed sum: AFR
In practice this is a bit more difficult than it looks, starting at the point of defining capital. The first mistake would be to use for GC a value in a currency, because that is constantly changing. You cannot compare just by the diggest 100 Gold backed US Dollars from 1920 with 100 exchange rate valued US Dollars from 2023, and we have to find a more constant value, such as how much an average man eats per day. Men, no matter the skin colour or ethnicity, need about 3500 kalories a day in both 1920 and 2023. The cash they need will be different so. Therefore, it makes sence to change the GC from US Dollars into food prices. So, how many Eggs was the GC in e.g. the US American economy one day before the monetary system was introduced. E.g.: Rockefellas 1920 Cash could buy how many 1920ies Eggs, but for all values from created Real Estate, Arts in the US Museums, Cars and Radios, Furniture, Clothing and Precious Metals and Jewlery in all of the USA.
Than you check how many percent, and only the percent value, of credits given out on average fail to be returned. Like 10%. (I have no idea, if that is correct. It is an example). That would be an AFR 10. How many credit cycle of One Year are needed to decrease the GC by the AFR to reach a quarter, half and three quarters of the start GC?.
Than, you check in the history books what happend at those dates in the time line....and will be scared. War increases dramatically the more the GC decreases in that equation, no matter the argument that the money is not decreased, but just in different parts of society, because the GC is not money. It is how many Eggs money can buy and the AFR means how much of that goes annualy to the Central Bank. Yet, nobody ever rowed up at the FED for food packs. They all go to their Church, instead.
#gfyFreeWorld and all BS arguements designed to fight the conclusion not the reason.
CREDITS ARE FORBIDDEN!
if you understand that capital letter phrase not as the reason,
you must have been all awake in this school system, while
I slept
and was all awake reading the originals of those books
you have just been told about at night
so
FUCKYOU
and what did they tell you about these tins:
That there was no gas in, is true. That you all don't get the conclusion of showers and chemical reaction of powder and water to torturing to death over about five minutes....is my problem!
Yours, IronClad The Goblin
a Witcher Knight King you know only as fary tails from the same guys.
