Saturday, 2 March 2024

Theory and Reality and Politics

 Are in no topic so badly fucking up good intentions as in 

What Is Communism
So, in the beginning of industrialisation when the steam machine turned efficient philosphers turned economists wondering where the machine age could lead us to. The Top 3 are:
Adam Smith was an 18th-century Scottish economist, philosopher, and author who is considered the father of modern economics. Smith argued against mercantilism and was a major proponent of laissez-faire economic policies. (Steam machines turend efficient by  John Smeaton in the Philosophical Transactions published in 1751)
Keynesian economics is a macroeconomic economic theory of total spending in the economy and its effects on output, employment, and inflation1. It was developed by the British economist John Maynard Keynes during the 1930s in an attempt to understand the Great Depression1. Keynesian economics served as the standard macroeconomic model in the developed nations during the later part of the Great Depression, World War II, and the post-war economic expansion (1945–1973)2. It lost some influence following the oil shock and resulting stagflation of the 1970s. (When steam locs still outran diesel locomotvis like the 4-6-2 "Pacific" Class A4 engines built at Doncaster Works in 1936)
Marxian economics, or the Marxian school of economics, is a heterodox school of political economic thought. Its foundations can be traced back to Karl Marx's critique of political economy. However, unlike critics of political economy, Marxian economists tend to accept the concept of the economy prima facie. Marxian economics comprises several different theories and includes multiple schools of thought, which are sometimes opposed to each other; in many cases Marxian analysis is used to complement, or to supplement, other economic approaches. Because one does not necessarily have to be politically Marxist to be economically Marxian, the two adjectives coexist in usage, rather than being synonymous: They share a semantic field, while also allowing both connotative and denotative differences. (When steam machines run factories exchangeing manufaturing workshops mid 18hundreds which is the 19th century you English experts of the BKA (he said no problem, that asshole)
The last about Marx quite nails it on the different schools part that also opone each other. The pitty of Karl Marx, who is one of the three most important economic philosphers of the industrialisation, is that politicians jumped him who actually only stated that markets will create monopols that than will stop serving the customers and used a village as an example of shared economic activity.
Bam. Someone created the Political Officer and the People Owned Nation from there...
Until this day, hardly anyone realy read his two main books or even put it into historic context of deseases, wars and protests during his time instead even in Marxist Socialist Nations studying Marx was reading all and every single letter between him and a friend who happend to have had a factory. 
Instead of reasoning together the mighty of this Dark Modern Times behave like Cercis, but to the scared people, yet you are not many, you are just most scary assholes on drugs using fertilzer and explosivies as so much not intended. So, who is the real Marxist Commi mother fucker here??