That humans are becoming useless in any economy by technological advances. First of all, we have to understand that we have no economic philosophers anymore. Karl Marx was the latest of the big once analysing and predicting the industrial revolution. The only book more often abused and missunderstood than the Bible are his books.
There was not one single word on shooting the Romanovs as just one example, but a lot of critique and thought about what could go wrong with market monoplisation for everyone.
In general, all great economic philosophers thought that every technological invention with impact on productive effiency liberating parts of the work force from its current tasks will lead into bindig them into new tasks.
Simplified, a tractor taken 20 workers of the farm, needs them in a factory to be produced and in a work shop to be maintained and sold creating this way a more comfortable life. In a chain reaction this also creates more jobs by the need for gyms, to not get fat off the field work, increases trade by more production on the farms and new products from factories and this way increases birth rates by creating a more stable progress and secure future for everyone, but in new jobs and a changing society.
Except the markets end in monpols and the chain reaction stops falling into destruction.
Considering the human mind, this means war, in a time of nuclear bombs and a society that harbours KZ industrialists......I am serious....Armageddon or Apocalypse, but that's the two options.
I personaly, as the most hated smartalerk insisting on plain English to be frank, suggests Slum Coltoure instead of existing versions of kapitalism or still around communism, even so it might be the next Marx Village.
A slum is a urban place in which everyone has personal ownership, but still helps another without getting something back directly. This creates a butterfly effect leveling the poverty of the slum over all creating a comfortable microclimate that makes life easier.
The main difference is that noone acts to become rich. Every strategy to create huge difference to the others around is doomed to fail. Everyone who intends will have to move away and only those are staying that have different intentions with money than having money as good itself.
In our economy a rich will be easily tempted to act unmoraly as long as the monatery system is based on credit attached money to a level that they are forced to in order to keep their wealth.
In extreme situations you will have on Oscar SchÃndler with one list, but a list with hundreds of slave owners from supporting to cowards exploiting thousands to the least they usefull for. In a slum they all fight with each other against the intruder and anyone who helps will be closer to Schindler than to the others.
In order to scale this up....we would have to take down .... CIA, BKA and BND and acknowlege that Schindler may have had no place in any system except as a long term prisoner for the side he choose.
So....I am sure we go for war, right BKA? You innocent sheep only here to help me and my mental desease, like tearing down slums for concrete blocks insisting on you having the best intentions.
