In both German nations a Public Building needs to be accessible by every subject of the public and can only be limited to prevent harm of its purpose or other subjects of the public.
A Press Conference of a legitimate politic Party in a Public Building would be at first thought considered to be a Public Meeting in a Public Building and should be considered free to attend, if no disturbances arise.
Well. No.
?
At least a registered Press ID is needed, but checked at one person only.
#igotstuck
Another problem is that all parties insist on a conflict solution. The Party could have asked the man to remain silent letting him understand that they do feel aggravated by his known content or collect his email address to send him a recording asking him to leave out of courtesy to their feelings. Instead, they insist that their Rights while Hosting a Meeting is superior to his Freedom of Press proclamation or any Public Building purpose and status.
The Germans have not learned or established a congruent predictable Republican Philosophy of Law. Instead it is still factualy The Rule of The Stronger depending on each situation, first. The woman stating to clarify his Press Status or Rights in Public after having enforced their will proofs that.
#provos #IRAmovement
