Dr Google sais on How to open an argument in Court: tell the jury in the beginning that you are going to describe what the evidence will establish, and then never say that again unless there is an objection. Let the facts themselves argue your case. Assemble the facts, and present them in a manner that leaves only one conclusion – the one you are advancing.
The Search engine is right about an argument being valid only, if there is no valid objection.
Therefore, a Judge can not say: It is fraud, but you have to keep paying, because he argues with an Objection and not an Argument even so the Objection defeats the Argument.
This Judge is what Provos call Confed or Confederate, being known since the 1960ies as common unamerican argumentation. All (hu)men are made equal, but not Blacks is the same line of illicit argumentation, because Black are (hu)men, too included by "all" defining humans.
#MIB #provos #thedomesticenemy
In no School of Law than the German it is worse...
