If science is based on giving as fact God would not exist, would coming back after 5000 years stating ownership not be a bit of thin argument, scientifically, because of the inheriting amount of relatives in between then and today?
Now it is an religious argument? That would be a fundementalistic and extremist one considering the Diaspora Rule and Mystic Believe only the Messiah may establish a Jewish Kingdom. That would turn ... Jesus into a Prophet and Bibbi into a major asshole.
Obviously, this is no way to argue. The point I don't get it is why everyone into propaganda believes all spectators would not get the difference of an argument and a narrative, a word I am glad it finally was introduced for "bullshitting around while fighting" aka BS.
Realistic?
The Kingdome of Hell. A none physically existing kingdom build like a modern dome. All watch some playing so far away they all are just tiny figures in distance, but they make your day while you have no impact!
