We are making it! Fuck you Bibbi! #thevaninme
#cyberpunkcoltoure
PS: The Logo. The speaker is missing that it needs no two exact copies, but the logo and one mirrored one. If that was coincidence and therefore what is called in mysticism A sign of God it tells us as much as if someone carefully thought about that, the fucking same message as the Yin Yang Symbol does.
To keep a long story short. Conspiracies are not the problem, interpretation is and you better get the message straight.
An example... survival of what?
PS: Just so no one can say I did not tell em: Bibbis Crew is out as much as Trump ones. We all get that, don't we? No way they pulled that!
So, given that it's true, and I did not test it, there are two next thoughts. Can a person be so good in graphical symmetrical art to create that and can coincidence create such graphical surprises?
Before making a decision, there needs to be proof or evidence for any of the two.
The actual major problem, and that's why Conspiracy Theories are more dangerous than most Conspiracies, is the fear of the uknkwn.
Can you dare to accept that you don't know, if that logo trick was true, if its planned or coincidence?
Finally, is AI not property understood by the experts who focus on use cases and not technical philosophy, which s not their point. Technical philosophy we all will understand in terms of engines. The motor comes both fully mechanically or with electronic parts. It is both true that these are follow up steps in motor evolution and different concepts. One is a carbonator the other fuel infection. More we don't need to know here, because it is about understanding the term I use, not a motor and that what the Experts do.
So, AI developers created about the first logic software of which they can't tell what it will eventually do. In Giana Sisters that was pretty clear up to useing cheat codes to keep going over trying and trying and trying.
AI is more like a calculator. If you enter 347890366784 x 4589377892 (I swear I randomly... Anyway) the Developer will know the result is the result, but not the exact number.
Do you know what I mean?
It is different perspectives. The developer has succeeded when the software multiples correctly, the user when having a correct number.
AI is reasoning. It is a calculator for language. It will be perfect in riddles asking about relatives that I refuse to even get into: Three persons in a car and one is a Dad...bla bla bla... That means depending on text entered it goes. Different wording can alter the result like high end mathematicians give respect to each other about how they solved a mathematical problem in terms of which way they took.
Did you know that AI can hallucinate? Ask your AI ...
