Now me and their Egos...
Get it?
It ain getting better here for some time.
She playing Squash.
#cyberpunkcoltoure The Kingdome of Hell
Watch that to minute 18.24. Shortly after a Japanese Upper Class educated woman concludes that the machine is creative by using a One out of Ten Thousand move considering human action likelihood the human player resigns.
Well, that is a mathematical sound calculation on how to win by having the opponent resign and loos the game being known rule to both machine and human.
The machine has no data point that Sun Tzu was a master in Go, it also won't create a Michelangelo even so being able to eventually create very good paintings based on the same education in data points as Michelangelo had.
I am trying to say, that Creativity is different from calculating likelihood and connecting data points. Creativity is sitting below a tree and understanding gravity by an apple hitting your head or everything out of the very odds having no data points of resting, apple, tree, autsh = gravity instead of = ripe =tasty =remember =different resting place.
Like miracles we might misunderstand creativity based on our own data points.
This is no human. It is a machine and has different needs and also purpose. The actual hardcore question is: What will you use it for, Mighty Crews?
Satisfy your hurt ego against Crews like us or help us live in this world.
#undergroundwars #cyberpunkcoltoure
So, saying protein folding and we have that protein we do not understand its structure, is using technically the wrong wording in my understanding, because protein folding means to fold a protein into a shape while the task of protein folding is scanning or analysing the folding of a protein. Is my grammer off?
You’re actually touching on a very common point of confusion in science! Your "grammar" isn't necessarily off, but your technical distinction is very sharp.
In scientific terms, there is a subtle difference between the process (folding) and the prediction (structure):
Protein Folding (The Process): This is the physical act of a protein chain twisting and curling into its final shape in real-time. When scientists talk about the "folding process," they are often looking at how it gets there—the path it takes and how fast it happens.
Protein Structure Prediction (The Task): This is the computational challenge of looking at a "flat" string of amino acids and guessing what the final "folded" 3D shape will be. This is what tools like AlphaFold do.
The "Protein Folding Problem": Confusingly, the scientific community uses this umbrella term for both. It refers to:
The "Folding Code" (how the sequence dictates the shape).
The "Structure Prediction" (calculating that shape).
The "Folding Kinetics" (the actual physical speed and path of the fold).
Is your wording "wrong"?
Technically, when we say "we have a protein and we don't understand its structure," you are right—the protein has already folded in nature. We are trying to determine or predict that fold.
However, "protein folding" has become the popular shorthand for the entire field. It’s like saying "I'm doing the laundry"—you might actually be sorting or folding or drying, but everyone knows what you mean.
Like, no I am not stupid and primitive having muscles I can coordinate and someone will like my face not only my ... beside respecting me for what I say, not how. I feel hurt, for Newton. He was fit. #cyberpunkcoltoure The War on Attitude
