#Ukrain

 Awesome, you may keep that. Yes, a spike at a chain and a few hundred horse power can pull that partially apart, but why would you do that?

The Westwall and Maginot Line turned out to be a waste of concrete and resources, except being something they were not build by Nazis and instead intended to stop the Nazis pushing south and then over the Rhine, but than my history would be what really happened...

The facts we can all find is that large bunker lines are useless and barb wire barriers only stop infantry units. Building them is not state of the art military defense line building.

This being said, would I return the favor and integrate these lines into my strategy being a Separatist. The Ukrainians can not cross neither except at gate points.

That means I, Napoleon Seperatist Russe je suis (;-| do you go off on that, Deutscher?), would either pull off forces from those stretches or create fake build ups to check the reaction on the other side while intending to only cross by all that low passes fast that line in about 5 meters above ground.

That means, I concentrate infantry in trucks there. Offroad, robust and fast moving trucks loaded with soldiers and not that much ammo actually. If the other side, especially all that Spiegel called Nazi Regiments a few years ago in a long forgotten time, I'd use jets and attack helicopters while the infantry goes all onto their trucks, but does a hard turn to walk away. Instead of a combined attack only airborn systems strike in hit and run takes, while the infantry moves to places they can engage in direct house to house combat or fill my own defense lines. 

Artillery, especially long range above 50km ballistic rocket systems are placed in range of gates within the Ukrainian lines and my own trenches extend with a slight gap those no walking areas to further narrow down effective infantry movements.

About the two lines in WW2? So Doc Google tell me...

Yes, the Maginot Line was a much more "closed," continuous, and deeply fortified line than the Siegfried Line. The Maginot Line focused on dense, state-of-the-art, and interconnected underground fortresses along the direct German border, whereas the Siegfried Line (West Wall) was a less uniform series of shallower, scattered bunkers, mostly built later, designed for more flexible, mobile defense. 
Maginot Line Characteristics:

    Highly Intensive: Focused on high-density fortifications (142 forts and ~5,000 

       blockhouses) over a smaller area, making direct assault nearly impossible.
    Integrated Design: featured deep underground railways and interconnected fighting 

       positions that created a solid, continuous front in key sectors.
    Limited Scope: It did not extend along the entire Belgian border due to diplomatic issues 

       and reliance on a move into Belgium, which was its fatal strategic flaw.

So, the defense systems facing Autre-Rhine (the other side of the Rhine) were forward positions made to let Hanoveran, now called Nazi, forces cut inbetween them to be wiped out by cross and forward fire after having and attempting to cross the Rhine turning the river into part of the system. 

Yes, there were bunkers and other fortifications on the east side of the Rhine, though they served a different strategic purpose than the main frontline positions.
While the primary "combat" line of the Siegfried Line (Westwall) was situated on the west bank to block invaders from ever reaching the river, the defensive system was designed in "depth." This included several layers that extended eastward. 

Throw a nuclear bomb! Try.... and keep trusting a Germany more than someone being called Schizophrenic Paranoid by a German despite their even official history and my fucking skin complexion. ;-) through the Downfall and to Le Terrisage.

#noblessoblige

#cyberpunkcoltoure