Friday, 8 May 2026

#provos #gangcoltoure #streetwars

 This is real. Toxic Gangs are like tiny Sherriffs of Nottingham. If Cops go dirty it just adds another layer of toxic gang to the situation.

Most miss that Robin Hood was the actual Lord of the Nottingham Shire and while away on the Crusades to retaliate the attacks against Jerusalem by the Teutonic Order same liked men took power over his Castle, Land and People.

Yes, a brutal massacre occurred when European Crusaders conquered Jerusalem in July 1099 during the First Crusade. After a five-week siege, Crusaders breached the city walls and slaughtered thousands of Muslim and Jewish inhabitants, with reports indicating that many were killed in homes, streets, and synagogues over several days. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key details of the 1099 Jerusalem massacre include:
  • Targeted Demographic: The violence was largely directed at non-Christian inhabitants, including Muslims and Jews, who were systematically killed, burnt, or sold into slavery.
  • Scale of Violence: Contemporary accounts vary, with some suggesting nearly the entire non-Christian population was killed, while some modern scholars debate the exact scale. Some sources highlight that survivors of the initial breach were killed indiscriminately.
  • Context: The massacre was considered an act of "extreme violence" often attributed by historians to both religious fervor and the brutal, customary, "three days of pillage" that often followed a siege that did not voluntarily surrender.
  • Aftermath: The massacre and subsequent looting resulted in the destruction of Jewish life in the city and the conversion of the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque into Christian sites

 HTML websites are even quicker created than paper back books. In the times of the Crusades most did not have access to books.

During the times of the Crusades (roughly 1095–1291 AD), hand-copying a complete Bible was a monumental task that could take several years for a single monk or scribe to complete. While a single Gospel might take a few months, a full Bible, often involving illuminated illustrations and gold leaf, was an exceptionally slow process.

Even if we disagree on my story about the Crusades, this is common truth, but not commonly understood:

If a modern Bible costs about the same as a burger meal ($10–$15), a Bible during the Crusades would have the relative value of a luxury estate or a high-end commercial property worth hundreds of thousands of dollars today. 

This being said, needs value be understood and acknowledged. Gold is of different understanding than a book and finds easier a buyer. A Book about Earth spinning around the Sun with scientific reasoning and logic based proof is to some irrelevant, worth a luxurious villa and for others a public open threat to be sentenced to Death Row if not recalled.

During the 1099 conquest, fire was a major element of both the battle and the subsequent massacre, but the specific destruction of "libraries" in Jerusalem is not well-documented in the same way as other historical cities. Instead, the focus of the destruction was on religious buildings and their associated text.

Crusader Knights were highly trained and sophisticated military men. They organized trade and adopted a lot of Moslem knowledge. They do not equal the psychological profile of mass murderers, plunderers and torturing tyrants. 

Here The Ocean of lies begins showing the war:

Studies on the relationship between high intelligence, education, and moral soundness yield mixed and complex results. While some evidence suggests highly intelligent individuals often have better moral reasoning, other studies suggest they may hold weaker, more flexible moral convictions. Research often focuses more on "moral reasoning" (the capacity for ethical thought) rather than "moral character" (the actual practice of morality). [1, 2, 3]
1. High Intelligence and Moral Reasoning
  • Greater Moral Sensitivity: Studies have indicated that gifted individuals often have a heightened sensitivity to fairness, justice, and honesty. They may score higher on tests of moral reasoning, approaching dilemmas from an abstract, post-conventional perspective.
  • Earlier Development: Children with high intellectual ability (HIA) can demonstrate earlier and superior ethical sensitivity compared to peers, particularly around 8-9 years old.
  • Complexity vs. Action: While intelligent individuals are equipped for in-depth moral analysis, this does not always translate into better moral behavior in daily life. [1, 2, 3]
2. Cognitive Ability and Moral Foundations
  • Weaker Moral Conviction: Recent studies (e.g., from the University of Surrey) have found that higher cognitive ability is linked to weaker endorsement of traditional moral values.
  • "Flexible" Morality: Research from 2025 indicated that smarter people are less reliant on and less emotionally attached to intuitive moral judgments. They tend to treat ethical scenarios as gradients rather than black-and-white, leading to a "flexible" or "nuanced" approach that can be interpreted as lower moral conviction. [1, 2, 5]
3. Education and Ethical Practice
  • Small Correlation: A meta-analysis of studies found a small-to-medium positive relationship between education and ethical practice (\(d = 0.44\)).
  • Role of Training: Education and specialized training in ethics do help align actions with values like honesty and respect.
  • Power and Application: Education acts as a magnifier; it gives people the power to better achieve their goals, whether those goals are helping or hurting others. [1, 2, 3]
4. Key Caveats
  • No Direct Link: Research suggests there is no direct correlation between high IQ and better moral behavior in daily life.
  • Context Dependence: Morality is highly context-dependent and shaped by culture, meaning "moral soundness" can be defined differently across groups.
  • Alternative Intelligence Types: Some studies investigate "moral intelligence"—the ability to apply universal principles like integrity and compassion—which is not necessarily synonymous with high academic IQ. [1, 2]
In summary, highly intelligent people are generally better equipped to reason through complex ethical dilemmas, but this does not make them inherently more morally sound in their behavior. They may simply be less rigid in their adherence to conventional moral rules

"While some evidence suggests highly intelligent individuals often have better moral reasoning, other studies suggest they may hold weaker, more flexible moral convictions."

That suggests that more intelligence means less moral obligations. I reject that and insist of manipulated research having created false evidence.

Sadly, we are since the beginning of Industrialization again in constant militant exchange. To me, it is again A Lord Robin Hood Vs a Fake Sherriff Tyrant. 

IRA. irish republican army. provos. gang wing. 

It is time we hit the Top Floors.
#cyberpunkcoltoure 

PS:

The term "forced schooling" generally refers to compulsory education laws—the legal requirement for children to attend school. In educational debates, critics often use this term to highlight the coercive nature of traditional systems compared to voluntary models like Summerhill. [1]

While classic schooling and Summerhill are specific philosophies, "forced schooling" is the mechanism used to ensure children are educated. Here is how it compares in terms of intelligence and development:

📈 Cognitive vs. Non-Cognitive Trade-offs

Research into compulsory schooling reforms shows a clear "tug-of-war" between different types of mental and emotional development.
Benefit of "Forced" SchoolingDrawback / Cost to Intelligence
IQ Boost: Each additional year of compulsory schooling typically raises IQ by 1 to 5 points.Reduced "Grit": Studies show forced schooling can actually decrease emotional stability, grit, and patience.
Economic Floor: It ensures a baseline of crystallized intelligence (literacy, numeracy) necessary for most jobs.Stifled Innovation: Critics argue that forcing a standard curriculum reduces the "diversity of thinking" needed for innovation.
Social Equalizer: It helps bridge the gap for children from disadvantaged backgrounds who might otherwise lack stimulation.Hostile Attribution: Some research suggests compulsory environments can increase a "hostile attribution bias" (expecting the worst from others).

Key Comparisons

1. The "Compliance" Intelligence

"Forced" schooling excels at creating industrial intelligence: the ability to follow instructions, meet deadlines, and perform under external pressure.
  • Classic/Forced: Focuses on Extrinsic Motivation. You learn because you have to, which builds discipline but can lead to burnout or a "dislike" of learning.
  • Summerhill: Focuses on Intrinsic Motivation. Students only attend classes when they are genuinely curious, which builds a "love of learning" but may leave gaps in "boring" foundational knowledge. [6, 9, 10, 11, 12]

2. The "Safety Net" vs. "The Ceiling"

  • Forced Schooling acts as a floor: It prevents "intellectual neglect" by ensuring every child is exposed to a minimum level of knowledge.
  • Summerhill removes the ceiling: By allowing children to follow their obsessions (e.g., spending all day in a woodshop or coding), it allows for "expert-level" intelligence in specific niches much earlier than traditional schools. [1, 6, 13, 14]

💡 The "Brain Plasticity" Paradox

The brain is highly plastic during school years. Forced schooling physically shapes the brain to be better at standardized testing and logic. However, the "stress" of a forced environment can sometimes impair the prefrontal cortex, which handles complex decision-making and emotional regulation. [4, 15, 16, 17]
If you are weighing these for a specific reason, would you like to know:
  • How homeschooling or "unschooling" (voluntary but non-communal) compares?
  • Which model leads to higher long-term financial earnings?
  • How to supplement a "forced" education to get the benefits of Summerhill at home?

Don't trust a PhD
but your happiness.
school like Robin Hood