I am not sure what drove her, Sarah with an h, but she managed to show up on a AfD meeting. Somewhere.
However. The point that struck me was when she described the questions of the Citizens. Such as of one guy who had a Lesbian Club buddy in his glider plane club that was scared of AfD. The response... was so hardcore German and her's the same. So check that:
The AfD guy said that they would not, I quote, drink kitty blood at night. Then, and here we go all German, he should tell her that the do not eat kitties.
Sherlock, why does he start with drinking blood and then refers to eating baby cats??
Look, each single war of yours was based on exactly that kind or argumentation, beside how you come up with that metaphor? Mummy Cat hunts at night?
#thegermans
#igotstuck
Sarah, that's why I feel you and Michel are fucking idiots of Zionism... but seriously idiots.
#cyberpunkcoltoure
Look you are German, not Jews, fuck your ego:
Michel Friedman, the prominent German attorney and former vice-president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, condemned Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ as antisemitic because he viewed it as a dangerous revival of medieval "deicide" narratives.
Then the reactions are Anti-Semitic, not the movie. Jesus was and remains a Jew. Turning him into anything else, is Anti-Semitic. The movie shows most explicitly the torturing of him which was executed by Roman Soldiers while Jews watched in fear. His line of argumentation is missing the point like drinking cat blood and eating cats is not the same no matter a dead cat. There is no way any of you visited any other school, but a German one.
[1] (https://secure.cbn.com/entertainment/screen/ANS_passion_german2.aspx), [2] (https://secure.cbn.com/entertainment/screen/ANS_passion_german2.aspx)
Friedman based his criticism on several core arguments:
1. A Relapse into the Middle Ages
Friedman explicitly warned that the movie represented a "relapse into the Middle Ages". He compared the film to medieval Passion Plays. Historically, these theatrical performances blamed Jewish people collectively for the crucifixion of Jesus and frequently served as catalysts for violent anti-Jewish pogroms across Europe. [1] (https://www.catholicleague.org/the-passion-of-the-christ/), [2] (https://bustedhalo.com/articles/the-problem-with-the-passion/), [3] (https://secure.cbn.com/entertainment/screen/ANS_passion_german2.aspx), [4] (https://secure.cbn.com/entertainment/screen/ANS_passion_german2.aspx)
Again. Continuous line.
2. Perpetuating the "Christ-Killer" Canard
A primary concern shared by Friedman and other Jewish leaders was the film's intense focus on the collective role of Jewish authorities and crowds in orchestrating Jesus' death. By emphasizing the "deicide" charge (the myth that Jews killed God), Friedman argued that the movie validated foundational Western antisemitic tropes rather than following the modern, reformed theological frameworks adopted by mainstream Christian churches since Vatican II. [1] (https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-feb-23-me-passion23-story.html), [2] (https://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/23/us/passion-film-is-incendiary-2-jewish-leaders-report.html), [3] (https://www.adl.org/resources/news/passion-relies-theme-anti-semitism)
That is more complicated. So, he says:
You are entirely correct that on-screen, the physical brutality is carried out almost exclusively by Roman soldiers. Critics like Michel Friedman and various historians did not argue that the movie hid Roman cruelty. [1] (https://www.catholicleague.org/the-passion-of-the-christ/)
Instead, their accusation of a "deicide" narrative focused on who the movie portrays as the driving moral and political force behind that cruelty. In their view, the film frames the Romans as mere tools, while presenting Jewish figures as the architects of the execution. [1] (https://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/23/us/passion-film-is-incendiary-2-jewish-leaders-report.html), [2] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Catholicism/comments/ri780t/is_the_passion_of_the_christ_antisemitic/)
Critics highlighted several specific sequences, creative choices, and even hidden audio elements to support this argument:
1. The Manipulation of Pontius Pilate
Critics argued that the film heavily whitewashes the historical Roman governor Pontius Pilate. In the movie, Pilate is portrayed as a sensitive, conflicted leader trapped in a corner. The Jewish High Priest, Caiaphas, and the Jewish crowds are shown as a relentless, angry mob forcing Pilate’s hand. By framing Pilate as a reluctant participant who is blackmailed into ordering the crucifixion, critics argued the film shifts the legal and moral blame of "killing God" from Rome to the Jewish authorities.
He did not too me. Instead I understood him as the typical soft touch handshake despot to be expected in that position.
Yes, Saddam Hussein was occasionally described by certain foreign visitors and biographers as having a surprisingly soft, limp, or gentle handshake.
That is not gentle, you idiots. That is a lack of respect. They can smile and grap a hand laughing, just not with a fuck like you.
[1] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[2] [https://www.facebook.com](https://www.facebook.com/shinetv.nz/posts/the-passion-of-the-christ-focuses-on-the-last-twelve-hours-of-jesus-of-nazareths/2233387970053555/)
[3] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[4] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[5] [https://www.quora.com](https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Pharisees-facilitate-the-Trial-of-Jesus)
[6] [https://medium.com](https://medium.com/@zduncan/jesus-and-the-pharisees-0b62604e90c1)
[7] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_%281979_film%29)
[8] [https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu](https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/Ludemann_Passion)
[9] [https://www.voanews.com](https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2004-02-25-7-us-67488102/386586.html)
[10] [https://www.academia.edu](https://www.academia.edu/1360043/Mel_Gibsons_The_Passion_of_the_Christ_A_Plea_for_Fairness)
[11] [https://nelsonmcbs.com](https://nelsonmcbs.com/the-passion-of-the-christ-2004-mel-gibsons-powerful-portrayal-of-the-suffering-and-sacrifice-of-jesus/)
[12] [https://westpalmbeachchurchofchrist.com](https://westpalmbeachchurchofchrist.com/topical/salvation/who-killed-jesus.html)ads the trial, mocks Jesus, and explicitly demands the death penalty from Pontius Pilate. [3, 4]
[2] [https://www.facebook.com](https://www.facebook.com/shinetv.nz/posts/the-passion-of-the-christ-focuses-on-the-last-twelve-hours-of-jesus-of-nazareths/2233387970053555/)
[3] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[4] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[5] [https://www.quora.com](https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Pharisees-facilitate-the-Trial-of-Jesus)
[6] [https://medium.com](https://medium.com/@zduncan/jesus-and-the-pharisees-0b62604e90c1)
[7] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_%281979_film%29)
[8] [https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu](https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/Ludemann_Passion)
[9] [https://www.voanews.com](https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2004-02-25-7-us-67488102/386586.html)
[10] [https://www.academia.edu](https://www.academia.edu/1360043/Mel_Gibsons_The_Passion_of_the_Christ_A_Plea_for_Fairness)
[11] [https://nelsonmcbs.com](https://nelsonmcbs.com/the-passion-of-the-christ-2004-mel-gibsons-powerful-portrayal-of-the-suffering-and-sacrifice-of-jesus/)
[12] [https://westpalmbeachchurchofchrist.com](https://westpalmbeachchurchofchrist.com/topical/salvation/who-killed-jesus.html)ads the trial, mocks Jesus, and explicitly demands the death penalty from Pontius Pilate. [3, 4]
## 1. Who Exactly Demanded the Death of Jesus?
In the film, the primary group demanding the death of Jesus is the Sanhedrin—the high council of Jewish religious leaders. [2, 3]
* The Sadducees (The Leaders): Historically and scripturally, the chief priests—most notably the High Priest Caiaphas and his father-in-law Annas—belonged to the Sadducee sect. In the movie, Caiaphas is the driving force. He orchestrates the nighttime arrest, leads the trial, mocks Jesus, and explicitly demands the death penalty from Pontius Pilate. [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
In the film, the primary group demanding the death of Jesus is the Sanhedrin—the high council of Jewish religious leaders. [2, 3]
* The Sadducees (The Leaders): Historically and scripturally, the chief priests—most notably the High Priest Caiaphas and his father-in-law Annas—belonged to the Sadducee sect. In the movie, Caiaphas is the driving force. He orchestrates the nighttime arrest, leads the trial, mocks Jesus, and explicitly demands the death penalty from Pontius Pilate. [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
The Pharisees: In the wider Gospels, the Pharisees frequently argue with Jesus over theology and law. However, by the time of the arrest and trial, the chief priests (Sadducees) took the lead because they held political and temple authority under Roman rule. In Gibson's film, the Council is presented largely as a singular, unified block of religious authorities.
## 2. Who Was Portrayed as the Bystanders?
The film features different categories of "bystanders," categorized by their reaction to the execution:
* The Hostile Crowd (The "Mob"): The most vocal bystanders are the Jerusalem crowd assembled outside Pilate’s palace. Driven and manipulated by Caiaphas’ priests, this crowd serves as an angry, chanting mob that repeatedly shouts for Jesus to be crucified and demands the release of the criminal Barabbas instead. [7, 8, 9]
* The Sympathetic / Grieving Bystanders: To counter charges of blanket antisemitism, the film includes Jewish bystanders who oppose the execution. This includes:
* The Dissenting Councillors: During the nighttime trial, a few members of the Sanhedrin stand up and object, calling the trial a sham and a violation of Jewish law, before being aggressively thrown out of the court by Caiaphas' guards.
* The Mourners: As Jesus carries the cross through the streets (the Via Dolorosa), he passes Jewish women weeping for him. A Jewish man, Simon of Cyrene, is forced by Roman soldiers to help carry the cross. Simon transitions from an annoyed bystander to a fiercely protective ally who tries to shield Jesus from the Roman whips. [3, 7, 10]
* The Romans as Indifferent Bystanders: While the Roman soldiers are the physical tormentors, Roman leadership acts as indifferent bureaucrats. Pontius Pilate is shown as a passive bystander to his own legal system, washing his hands of the execution to keep the peace, while Roman guards treat the event like a cruel afternoon sport. [4, 9]
* The Supernatural Bystander (Satan): An artistic invention of Gibson's is an androgynous, ghostly depiction of Satan. Satan glides silently through the crowds as an invisible bystander, feeding on the hatred and despair of the human actors to signify that a cosmic spiritual battle is taking place alongside the earthly one. [11]
Would you like to examine how historians view the real Pontius Pilate compared to how Mel Gibson portrays him, or explore which parts of the script came from sources outside the Bible? [1, 12]
[1] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[2] [https://www.facebook.com](https://www.facebook.com/shinetv.nz/posts/the-passion-of-the-christ-focuses-on-the-last-twelve-hours-of-jesus-of-nazareths/2233387970053555/)
[3] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[4] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Passion_of_the_Christ)
[5] [https://www.quora.com](https://www.quora.com/How-did-the-Pharisees-facilitate-the-Trial-of-Jesus)
[6] [https://medium.com](https://medium.com/@zduncan/jesus-and-the-pharisees-0b62604e90c1)
[7] [https://en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_%281979_film%29)
[8] [https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu](https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/Ludemann_Passion)
[9] [https://www.voanews.com](https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-a-2004-02-25-7-us-67488102/386586.html)
[10] [https://www.academia.edu](https://www.academia.edu/1360043/Mel_Gibsons_The_Passion_of_the_Christ_A_Plea_for_Fairness)
[11] [https://nelsonmcbs.com](https://nelsonmcbs.com/the-passion-of-the-christ-2004-mel-gibsons-powerful-portrayal-of-the-suffering-and-sacrifice-of-jesus/)
[12] [https://westpalmbeachchurchofchrist.com](https://westpalmbeachchurchofchrist.com/topical/salvation/who-killed-jesus.html)
So Michel: You are today those leaders. Even a known ex Cocaine Junky just as about all of our leaders responsible for the dark in The Dark Modernity. Back than, I assume the Roman tyranny imposed their own leaders proclaiming to be Jews. If that is true, is hard to research, and you are part of that hard problem by looking for trouble over arguments including ending Diaspora as a human. So Fuck you. Suck off Bibi and never mention Rabin again. Because who fuck am I trying to teach any of you?
PS: Every fucking Cocaine head tells me that gear is not interfering with their thinking. Each single one of you ... selfish assholes.
3. Damage to Interfaith Relations
Friedman argued that the movie had the potential to inflict severe damage on Christian-Jewish relations. He feared that the graphic, emotionally charged portrayal of Jewish characters as sadistic and relentless antagonists would reignite latent anti-Jewish sentiment among modern audiences who might lack historical context.
I feel your pain. Nobody loves you and you choose the Germans as your home. Still. That is mandatory:
In traditional Jewish thought, maintaining a clear mind is considered essential for fulfilling one's spiritual purpose, connecting with the Divine, and exercising moral free will. Neither the Torah nor the Talmud contains modern words like "narcotics," but both address substance use—traditionally focusing on alcohol and medicinal herbs—through the lens of mental clarity, self-control, and physical health. [1] (https://www.reddit.com/r/Judaism/comments/qekmvi/is_there_any_mention_of_drug_use_drugs_addiction/), [2] (https://www.ccarnet.org/responsa-topics/drugs/), [3] (https://momentmag.com/ask-rabbis-addiction/), [4] (https://aish.com/marijuana-and-judaism-what-does-jewish-law-say-about-the-subject/), [5] (https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-drugs/)
Except for authorized medical and pain management purposes, recreational drug use that alters or dulls consciousness is strongly discouraged or forbidden.
Alcohol and Herbs. So all that comes in powder and pills does not fall into that category and I am kinda certain Sarah as also a major problematic habit.
#cyberpunkcoltoure
