Since we developed from speach the written word, mankind thouhgt twice before writing down what they had in mind. Two stone plates carried the ten commandments and even the Romans wrote down only poetry and important historc events, but not every senat hearing.
Today, digital photography shows a society problem we have. Since taking pictures went digital we do 3000 pictures, and before on a trip five roles 30 each. But for most the quality output of about 5 to 10 picuters being good did not change.
If you go into a huge bookshop the belletristik section takes most space and is full of content that has no deeper meaning or relevance, but is only to kill time.
Like music is more than tone and sound, writings are more than words. They are supposed to fix a well thought for longer than a spoken phrase.
If you bought a book you throw away when moving, it was a waste of time and money, considering a time in which elite knights were protecting book transports considering them more valuable than gold, like a desert nomad will consider finding water more precious than oil.
Google fails to show us content. Based on the amount of content out there, just written already, a single search software can and does no cover it all. It also fails to qualify and sort the content. Every library has a system of order. There are sections for science, novels, picture books, child books, cook books and more, that than again have sub-sections which are again sorted by other categories such as year or author.
Even so there are standards for publishing content in the internet to have browsers displey them corectly overlooked by the W3 consortium, there are no standards, no set of rules to help any searching human or system to qualify the publication.
They check only certain technical parts and the Google monopole will prioritise where the money comes from over serving mankind. Universities, public or private, both also do ignore the needs of mankind and society by having no working search system published and Bing uses the very same database as Google does.
I am no conspiracy theoriest to state that this must be enforced and cannot be just a system fault, because it is against all and every market rule of all economic theorists.
In a free market competition will lead into oligopoles and finally into monopoles that than again will break by their own size.
From the beginning on there had been only three search engine systems in the world wide web. Yahoo, being maintained manually, a system doomed to fail considering the amount of content, the open directory project, that ended somewhen and some time ago using an automatic crawler system to create a searchable index of the words on a website it checked on and Google that did as the latter, but prioritised the displayed search requests of the user by the amounts of links of the websites it displayed assuming that better content will create more references. These references are the actual core point of technology the word wide web known as HTML.
Today, Google will make sure that we all keep using five websites in about ninty percent of all times which are all run by managers from about the same amount of universities. Only how many are also CIA employees or affiliates rests a secret.
We need a new world order. A free world order in which noone can control anyone else. That means chaos by complexity. All power to noone! Sounds familiar? I believe in complex systems, so I am a Cyberpunk. The jungle as the perfect system over a village or hirarchy.
Balls baby, no coward back.
#cyberpunkcoltoure
