First of all we have to put the wording straight. An Immigrant comes into a country to stay, an Emmigrant leaves a country for ever and a Migrant travels around. Then, there are also Conquerors and Travellers. A Conqueror comes attacking to take power in order to rule above the locals and Travellers were a people of Merchants that founded the first Post Service, turned Explorers, established Trade Routes like the famous Silk Road, but also needed bases and towns to support living travelling from ship yards to markets and had their own military to protect their lifestyle.
As I am telling you, the Pirates and U-Boats, The City of London and Hong-Kong & Macao.
Now imagine the Conquerors hook up with migrating Thieves and you understand what happened in two World Wars politically a lot better adding this to the missing links and dots of why would you actually attack each other when trade based on demand should explode by having factories at hand serving that entirely ... no matter the Cocaine.
That lifestyle of dominating another and seeing others as adversaries over potential partners dominates today in all medias.
This is why even the U.S.A. being founded by migration considers having a migration problem, struggles with being attractive as a home for foreigners and fails to find a healthy path for itself and all others they share the world with.
Remember, Smith was wrong and Nash proved it!
It must say: Individual ambition serves the common goal, if that ambition is inline with the common goals interests based on mutual ambition of all other individuals.
That means, that individual ambition standing against the common good will fail and threatens the success of the entire group. We only win together or not at all.
In a digital and mobile world that means that one against all can kill all, if all don't resist. One for All, All for One found its counter part during Industrialisation creating the need for One against All, All against One.
#noblessoblige
#thedarkmodernity
#cyberpunkcoltoure
