That actually was a perfect example of needed gun laws that do not infringe the right to bear arms.
You can't come up onto a premissis with ready to fire arms as neither civilian nor official on duty against workers that are way off a heavily guarded drug operation intending to check their work permits.
Which should make sense having understood American principles of Freedom different from Feudal Law creating privileges.
The entire gun rights discussion fell into the trap of arguing based on those grounds that intent to disarm to rule by arms themselves instead of holding on to American grounds of values, but on both sides.
Gun Laws must focus on gun abuse and may not infringe owning which guns.